🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong evidence".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is largely unfolding at the state level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to mimic this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and others indicate that states internationally are less and less content to wait for platforms to self-regulate.