Relatives' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.